The Slave Trade

Introduction: Understanding the Slave Trade

The slave trade represents one of the darkest chapters in human history, involving the capture, transport, and exploitation of millions of African people over several centuries. While the transatlantic slave trade is most well-known, the Indian Ocean slave trade involving East Africa, including the lands of the Nyamwezi and other Tanzanian peoples, was equally significant and has left lasting impacts on the region.

Understanding why the slave trade occurred requires examining multiple factors: economic motivations, social structures, technological capabilities, political circumstances, and ideological justifications. This analysis explores the slave trade from various perspectives, acknowledging its profound evil while seeking to understand its historical roots and consequences.

 

Part 1: The East African Slave Trade

1.1 Origins in Pre-Colonial East Africa

The slave trade in East Africa predates European involvement by centuries. Islamic law, which governed much of the Swahili coast from the 8th century onward, permitted slavery but also provided certain protections for enslaved people, including the possibility of emancipation. Slavery existed within African societies before the arrival of Europeans, typically involving household slaves, war captives, or individuals sold into slavery as punishment for crimes or debt.

The demand for slaves grew significantly with the expansion of the Indian Ocean trade economy. The Sultanate of Zanzibar, particularly under the Omani Al Said dynasty in the 19th century, became the center of East African slave trading. Zanzibar and Pemba islands housed massive slave markets where thousands of enslaved people were bought and sold annually. The clove plantations on these islands created enormous demand for labor, driving the expansion of slave raiding and trading throughout the mainland.

The traditional narratives often emphasized the role of Arab and Swahili traders as the primary agents of the slave trade, while depicting African societies as passive victims. However, historical research has revealed a more complex picture in which African traders, raiders, and even African leaders played central roles in capturing and supplying enslaved people to coastal markets. This understanding does not excuse the actions of Arab and European traders but provides a more accurate historical picture.

1.2 The Mechanics of the Trade

The slave trade in East Africa operated through established networks that connected interior communities with coastal markets. The process began when raiding parties, often composed of African warriors under the leadership of either African or Swahili commanders, attacked villages and captured inhabitants. These captives were then marched in chains to coastal trading posts, where they were examined for health and quality before being purchased by slave traders.

The journey to the coast, known as the "middle passage" in the Atlantic context, was often deadly in the East African context as well. Enslaved people were forced to walk hundreds of miles, often with minimal food and water. Those who became too weak to continue were sometimes killed or left behind. Estimates suggest that for every enslaved person who reached the coast alive, several others died during the journey from disease, exhaustion, abuse, or escape attempts.

Once at coastal markets, enslaved people were held in holding pens (often called "factories" or "barracoons") while buyers examined them. Prices varied based on age, health, gender, and skills. Women and children often commanded higher prices because of their utility in household work and plantation labor. Young men were valued for their labor capacity on plantations and for their ability to survive the harsh conditions of forced labor.

1.3 Major Trading Centers

Zanzibar was the largest and most infamous slave market in East Africa. Under the rule of Sultan Barghash bin Said (r. 1870-1888), Zanzibar became the center of the slave trade, with an estimated 50,000 to 100,000 slaves passing through the islands annually at its peak in the mid-19th century. The slave market in Zanzibar town was one of the largest in the world, and the stench from the holding pens was reportedly noticeable from ships in the harbor.

Kilwa was another major trading center, with a history of slave trading dating back to the medieval period. The Portuguese, who controlled Kilwa from 1505 to 1512 and maintained influence thereafter, were themselves involved in the slave trade before turning to abolition. Kilwa's position on an island off the southern Tanzanian coast made it a natural trading hub.

Bagamoyo, located on the mainland opposite Zanzibar, became an important terminus for caravans coming from the interior. The name "Bagamoyo" is said to derive from the Swahili phrase "bwaga moyo" (throw down your heart), reflecting the despair of enslaved people arriving there after their long march. The Catholic White Fathers mission in Bagamoyo was a major center for the rehabilitation of freed slaves.

________________________________________

Part 2: Why the Slave Trade Occurred

2.1 Economic Motivations

The Demand for Labor

The fundamental driver of the slave trade was the demand for labor in various economic systems. On the Swahili coast, the expansion of clove and coconut plantations required massive amounts of workers who could not be recruited locally. The Omani Sultanate, which controlled Zanzibar, had limited indigenous population and turned to enslaved labor from the mainland to meet its agricultural labor needs.

The growth of the sugar industry in the Indian Ocean world, particularly on islands like Mauritius and Réunion, created additional demand. European colonial enterprises in the Americas also sought African slaves, though the Atlantic trade dominated this commerce. The profitability of slave labor in plantation agriculture made the trade economically attractive to merchants and rulers.

Profit Margins

The slave trade was extraordinarily profitable for those involved. Slave traders could purchase an enslaved person in the interior for the price of a few cloth lengths or cheap trade goods, then sell them at coastal markets for ten times that amount or more. The transatlantic trade offered even higher profits, with enslaved people sold in the Americas for many times their purchase price in Africa.

This profit motive attracted numerous actors to the trade. Swahili and Omani merchants, Indian traders, and eventually European merchants all participated in the commerce. The enormous profits made the trade difficult to suppress, as the financial incentives for continued participation were immense.

The Role of Trade Goods

European manufactured goods, particularly textiles, guns, and metal products, were the primary currency of the slave trade. British, French, Portuguese, and American merchants supplied these goods to African and Swahili traders in exchange for enslaved people. The introduction of guns transformed warfare in the African interior, enabling more efficient raiding and the capture of more slaves.

The relationship between legitimate trade and the slave trade was complex. Some merchants engaged in both, while others focused exclusively on one or the other. The cloth and bead trade that had long connected the coast with the interior was increasingly integrated into the slave trade economy, as these goods served as payment for captured people.

2.2 Social and Political Factors

Warfare and Captives

A significant proportion of enslaved people in East Africa were victims of warfare. Inter-tribal conflicts, raids conducted specifically for slaves, and the aftermath of larger military campaigns all produced captives who could be sold into slavery. The expansion of the slave trade itself created more warfare, as groups raided neighbors specifically to capture people for sale.

The development of the "caravan" economy in regions like Nyamwezi country was closely connected to the slave trade. While some caravans focused primarily on ivory or other goods, many were involved in the slave trade either directly or by transporting slave captives to coastal markets. The profitability of the slave trade encouraged the development of armed bands that engaged in both trading and raiding.

Existing Slave Systems

The existence of slavery within African societies prior to the expansion of the export trade provided both a conceptual framework and an infrastructure for the slave trade. African societies had long practiced debt bondage, the enslavement of criminals, and the holding of war captives as slaves. The expansion of the export trade built upon these existing practices, transforming domestic slavery into a commercial enterprise.

Some African rulers actively participated in the slave trade, using enslaved people as a form of currency and engaging in slave raiding to capture subjects from neighboring groups. The wealth and power of some African leaders was directly tied to their involvement in the slave trade, creating strong incentives for its continuation.

Political Fragmentation

The political fragmentation of East African societies facilitated the slave trade by preventing coordinated resistance. The numerous chiefdoms and kingdoms of the interior lacked the political unity to mount effective opposition to slave raiding. Some rulers allied with slave traders to gain advantages over rivals, while others simply lacked the military capacity to protect their subjects.

The introduction of firearms by European and Swahili traders exacerbated this fragmentation. Groups that acquired guns could raid neighboring communities with impunity, creating cycles of violence that fed the slave trade. The uneven distribution of firearms meant that some communities became predators while others became prey.

2.3 Technological and Geographical Factors

Navigation Technology

The development of reliable sailing technology enabled the growth of Indian Ocean trade, including the slave trade. The dhow, with its distinctive lateen sail, could navigate the shallow waters of the East African coast and cross the ocean to Arabia and India. This technology allowed slave traders to move large numbers of people efficiently across the Indian Ocean.

The development of larger, more seaworthy ships by European traders in the 19th century increased the scale of the slave trade. Steamships could travel against the monsoon winds that had previously limited sailing vessel traffic, enabling more regular and predictable transport of enslaved people.

Geographic Access

The geography of East Africa, with its numerous inlets, islands, and hidden coves, provided numerous points for loading and unloading enslaved people away from prying eyes. The Swahili coast's position at the crossroads of Indian Ocean trade routes made it a natural hub for the slave trade. The lack of effective colonial naval presence until the late 19th century allowed the trade to flourish despite its illegality.

2.4 Ideological and Religious Justifications

Religious Permutations

Islamic law permitted slavery but also placed restrictions on enslavement. According to Sharia law, Muslims could not be enslaved, and enslaved people had certain rights, including the possibility of emancipation. However, in practice, these restrictions were often ignored or circumvented. Some Muslim traders justified their involvement in the slave trade by claiming that enslaved people were being brought to Islamic societies where they could convert to Islam.

Christianity, particularly as practiced in Europe and America, was more ambivalent about slavery. While some Christian denominations condemned slavery on theological grounds, others developed theological justifications for the institution. The "Curse of Ham" was invoked to justify African slavery, while the idea that Africans were "heathens" who needed Christian conversion provided another justification.

Racial Ideologies

The development of scientific racism in the 18th and 19th centuries provided ideological ammunition for the slave trade and slavery. European thinkers developed elaborate hierarchies of human races, placing Europeans at the top and Africans at the bottom. These "scientific" theories claimed that African peoples were inherently inferior and suited by nature for servitude.

The abolition of the slave trade in Britain and the United States did not stem from recognition of African equality but rather from changing economic conditions and Christian humanitarian movements. Even after abolition, the ideology of racial inferiority persisted, justifying colonial exploitation and the continued subjugation of African peoples.

________________________________________

Part 3: The Role of Different Participants

3.1 African Traders and Raiders

The role of African traders in the slave trade has been the subject of considerable historical debate. Early accounts often portrayed Africans as passive victims, while some later scholarship overemphasized African agency in ways that seemed to excuse European involvement. The reality is more complex.

African traders from the interior, such as the Nyamwezi and their neighbors, played essential roles in the slave trade. They organized caravans that transported enslaved people to the coast, sometimes traveling hundreds of miles. They served as intermediaries between interior communities and coastal merchants, providing market knowledge, translation services, and logistical support.

Some African traders specialized in the slave trade, while others dealt in various goods including ivory, rubber, and foodstuffs. The profitability of the slave trade attracted many participants, and competition among African traders sometimes drove down the prices paid to raiders, creating incentives for more aggressive raiding.

African rulers also participated in the slave trade, either by allowing slave traders to operate in their territories in exchange for tribute or by directly capturing and selling slaves from their own subjects. Some chiefs became wealthy through the slave trade, using their proceeds to acquire guns, goods, and political power.

3.2 Swahili and Arab Traders

Swahili and Omani Arab traders dominated the commercial end of the East African slave trade. They owned the ships, controlled the coastal markets, and maintained the networks that connected interior trading systems with Indian Ocean commerce. The Omani Sultanate of Zanzibar, particularly under Sultan Barghash, was deeply involved in the slave trade, deriving significant revenue from taxes on slave sales and plantation labor.

Swahili traders, many of whom were of mixed African and Asian heritage, served as intermediaries between Arab merchants and African suppliers. They established trading posts throughout the interior, extending credit to African traders and providing goods on consignment. Their knowledge of local languages and customs made them essential to the operation of the trade.

The participation of Muslim traders in the slave trade raises questions about the relationship between religion and commerce. While Islamic law technically prohibited the enslavement of Muslims, this restriction was frequently ignored. Some Muslim traders justified their activities by claiming that enslaved people were being brought to Muslim lands where they might convert, while others simply set aside religious scruples in pursuit of profit.

3.3 European Merchants and Colonial Powers

European merchants were deeply involved in the slave trade, particularly through the Atlantic trade that transported an estimated 12 million Africans to the Americas. While the East African slave trade was primarily controlled by Swahili and Arab traders, European merchants supplied many of the trade goods that enabled the commerce and eventually became direct participants.

The Portuguese were early entrants into East African trade, establishing trading posts and eventually controlling key ports like Kilwa and Mombasa. The Portuguese were involved in both the gold trade and the slave trade before their influence declined in the 18th century. British, French, and American merchants subsequently became involved in East African commerce, supplying textiles, guns, and other goods in exchange for ivory and slaves.

European colonial powers, even those that formally abolished the slave trade, often facilitated its continuation. Britain, which took the lead in abolition, was more effective at suppressing the Atlantic trade than the Indian Ocean trade. French colonial territories in the Indian Ocean remained involved in slave trading longer than British areas. The transition from slave-based to "legitimate" commerce was gradual and incomplete.

________________________________________

Part 4: Impact on African Societies

4.1 Demographic Effects

The slave trade had devastating demographic consequences for East African societies. Estimates suggest that between 2 and 4 million people were exported from the East African coast between 1800 and 1890, with many more dying during the capture and transport process. The actual numbers may have been significantly higher, as record-keeping was incomplete.

The demographic impact extended beyond those who were enslaved and exported. Communities that lost large numbers of people to raiding and kidnapping were disrupted and sometimes abandoned. The gender ratio was distorted, as more men than women were exported. Children were particularly vulnerable, both because they were easily captured and because they commanded high prices in coastal markets.

Some regions were depopulated entirely, with villages abandoned and agricultural land left uncultivated. The population loss created labor shortages that further hindered economic development. The long-term demographic effects, including reduced population density and altered age and gender structures, persisted for generations.

4.2 Social Disruption

The slave trade disrupted social structures and relationships throughout East Africa. The extended family and lineage systems that provided social security were undermined as members were captured and sold. Trust between communities broke down as the threat of raid made vigilance constant. The traditional authority of chiefs and elders was challenged as their inability to protect their people became apparent.

Violence became endemic as raiding parties attacked villages with increasing frequency. The availability of guns through trade intensified conflict, transforming what had been limited warfare into more deadly and destructive encounters. Communities that had previously lived in relative peace were forced to adopt defensive postures or migrate to safer areas.

The slave trade also created new social categories and hierarchies. "Free" people and "enslaved" people became more sharply differentiated, even as the boundaries between these categories remained fluid. Some enslaved people achieved freedom and wealth, while some free people fell into slavery through debt, crime, or capture. The social disruption created by the slave trade had lasting effects on community organization and social relations.

4.3 Economic Transformation

The slave trade transformed East African economies in complex ways. On one hand, it integrated East Africa into global trade networks, bringing new goods and technologies. On the other hand, it distorted economic development by channeling resources toward slave raiding and trading at the expense of productive activities.

Communities that specialized in the slave trade experienced relative prosperity in the short term, as the commerce generated wealth for traders and rulers. However, this prosperity was built on the extraction of human beings rather than sustainable production. When the slave trade was suppressed, these communities often struggled to adapt to legitimate commerce.

The slave trade also affected agricultural production. Labor was diverted from farming to raiding, trading, and plantation work. Some regions that had been productive agricultural areas became dependent on the slave trade for their livelihoods. The transition away from the slave trade was difficult for these communities.

4.4 Cultural Effects

The cultural impact of the slave trade was profound. Traditional beliefs and practices were disrupted as communities were destroyed and people were scattered. Religious practices changed as enslaved people converted to Islam or Christianity in hopes of improving their conditions. New cultural forms emerged in the diaspora, as enslaved Africans from different ethnic backgrounds created syncretic traditions.

The trauma of enslavement was passed down through generations. Families separated by the slave trade lost touch with their origins and heritage. The memory of the slave trade remained strong in communities that had been affected, even as the specific details were sometimes forgotten or suppressed.

The cultural effects also extended to those who participated in the slave trade. The normalization of violence and the commodification of human beings affected the societies that engaged in these practices. Some scholars argue that the slave trade had long-term effects on social trust and institutional development that continue to affect East African societies today.

 

Part 5: The Abolition of the Slave Trade

5.1 International Efforts

The abolition of the slave trade was a gradual process spanning much of the 19th century. Britain, which had become the dominant naval power, took the lead in suppressing the Atlantic slave trade through diplomatic pressure, naval patrols, and negotiation of anti-slavery treaties. The British Navy's West Africa Squadron intercepted slave ships and freed thousands of enslaved Africans.

In East Africa, abolition was slower and less effective. The British position was complicated by their need to maintain relations with the Sultan of Zanzibar, who derived significant revenue from the slave trade. The 1822 treaty between Britain and Zanzibar restricted but did not abolish the slave trade, and enforcement was inconsistent.

The 1873 Treaty of Zanzibar and the 1876 declaration prohibiting the export of slaves from the mainland marked the effective end of

Error! Filename not specified.

give few references in one list

Copy messageEdit message

Error! Filename not specified.

Thought for a moment

References: 

• Alpers, E. A. (1975). Ivory and Slaves in East Central Africa: Changing Pattern of International Relations to the Later Nineteenth Century. Heinemann.
• Fage, J. D. (2001). A History of Africa. Routledge.
• Rodney, W. (1972). How Europe Underdeveloped Africa. Bogle-L'Ouverture Publications.
• Thomas, H. (1997). The Slave Trade: The Story of the Atlantic Slave Trade, 1440-1870. Simon & Schuster.
• Lovejoy, P. E. (2000). Transformations in Slavery: A History of Slavery in Africa (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press.
• Sheriff, A. (1987). Slaves, Spices and Ivory in Zanzibar: Integration of an East African Commercial Empire into the World Economy, 1770-1873. James Currey.
• Austen, R. A. (1979). African Economic History: Internal Development and External Dependency. Heinemann.
• Middleton, J. (1992). The Tanzanian Slave Trade. In: J. M. Brown & R. H. Bates (Eds.), Historical Dictionary of Tanzania. Scarecrow Press.
• Giblin, J. (2005). The Politics of Memory: Locating the Zanzibar Slave Trade. In: T. Falola & C. Jennings (Eds.), African History: Sources and Interpretations. Carolina Academic Press.